Which type of prior statements is used to rehabilitate a witness after impeachment?

Enhance your Bar Exam preparation with Themis Bar Exam Quiz. Use hints and multiple choice questions to sharpen your understanding. Excel in your Bar Exam!

After a witness’s credibility has been challenged, you bolster their reliability by introducing prior consistent statements made before the impeachment situation or before the alleged motive to lie. These statements show the witness has maintained the same account over time, which supports their truthfulness and undermines claims of fabrication or bias. They’re offered to strengthen credibility, not to prove the content of the statement itself, and they’re especially relevant when the witness has been attacked for recent or inconsistent assertions. The other options don’t fit as well: prior inconsistent statements are used to impeach credibility, hearsay statements are generally excluded as evidence of truth, and silence isn’t a statement that can rehabilitate credibility.