Which of the following statements describes the proper use of a summary judgment motion?

Enhance your Bar Exam preparation with Themis Bar Exam Quiz. Use hints and multiple choice questions to sharpen your understanding. Excel in your Bar Exam!

The fundamental idea is that a summary judgment motion should be granted only when there is no genuine dispute about material facts and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In other words, the court can decide the case on the papers alone because the facts are clear and the law supports one side without needing a trial. This is why the correct description is that there is no genuine dispute of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Why the other ideas don’t fit: summary judgment is not appropriate if there is a genuine dispute about facts; resolving such disputes requires a trial. It doesn’t determine factual issues after a full trial; it aims to end the case without a trial when the facts aren’t in dispute. And it isn’t identical to a final judgment after a bench trial; it’s a pre-trial ruling based on the record, used to dispose of all or part of a case without a trial if the law favors one side.