Which of the following constitutes a defense to formation of a contract?

Enhance your Bar Exam preparation with Themis Bar Exam Quiz. Use hints and multiple choice questions to sharpen your understanding. Excel in your Bar Exam!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following constitutes a defense to formation of a contract?

Defenses to formation are reasons a contract cannot form or be enforceable from the start. Illegality, unconscionability, or public policy concerns fit this idea because if the agreement’s purpose or terms violate the law, are unconscionable, or run counter to public policy, the contract cannot be formed or enforceable as drafted. The other options point to what must exist for formation rather than defenses to formation. A definite offer and acceptance are about mutual assent, and consideration is the bargained-for exchange—without these, there isn’t a contract to form. Lack of capacity is a nuanced issue that often affects enforceability (a contract with a minor or intoxicated person can be voidable), rather than a straightforward defense to formation itself.

Defenses to formation are reasons a contract cannot form or be enforceable from the start. Illegality, unconscionability, or public policy concerns fit this idea because if the agreement’s purpose or terms violate the law, are unconscionable, or run counter to public policy, the contract cannot be formed or enforceable as drafted.

The other options point to what must exist for formation rather than defenses to formation. A definite offer and acceptance are about mutual assent, and consideration is the bargained-for exchange—without these, there isn’t a contract to form. Lack of capacity is a nuanced issue that often affects enforceability (a contract with a minor or intoxicated person can be voidable), rather than a straightforward defense to formation itself.

More practice questions